Energy Up International CBAM accreditation announcement
  1. Home
  2. CBAM
  3. Accreditation not granted.

Accreditation not granted.

The status, and its date. Nothing more.

The record

Current public position.

Accreditation bodyACCREDIA — Italy
Scope applied forVerification under the EU CBAM Regulation
ACCREDIA referenceDC26PRT0296
StatusAccreditation not granted · application accepted; documental review completed 19 October 2026; office assessment scheduled 28–29 October 2026
Accredited CBAM verification offered?No. Not before formal grant and not outside the approved scope
Last updated27 October 2026
OwnerCompliance and Accreditation Officer
Review cycleMonthly
Assessment pathway

Only milestones confirmed in writing are shown as reached.

  1. Application accepted

    Formally accepted by ACCREDIA under the reference above.

    Confirmed
  2. Document assessment

    Assessment of the management system, competence framework and CBAM procedures against the applicable requirements.

    Completed · 19 Oct 2026
  3. Office assessment

    On-site assessment of the body’s implementation of those procedures.

    Scheduled · 28–29 Oct 2026
  4. Witness planning

    Planning of the witnessed verification activity required before a decision.

    Not yet confirmed
  5. Witness assessment

    The accreditation body observes a verification being performed.

    Not yet confirmed
  6. Accreditation decision

    Grant, grant with conditions, or refusal. Until a grant is issued, no accredited CBAM service exists.

    Not yet confirmed
  7. CBAM Registry registration

    An accredited verifier registers in the CBAM Registry within two months of receiving accreditation; registration could not occur before 1 September 2026.

    After grant
Pathway steps and Registry timing follow the European Commission’s verification and accreditation guidance published on 24 August 2026. Milestone status above reflects written confirmations held by Energy Up International as at 27 October 2026.
The scope under assessment

Accreditation is granted by activity group, not as a single licence.

As at 5 September 2026, the application covers activity groups I to VIII — cement and clinker; hydrogen and ammonia; nitric acid; urea and mixed fertilisers; sintered ore, pig iron, DRI and crude steel; ferro-alloys; unwrought aluminium; and downstream iron, steel and aluminium goods — together with activity group LII, indirect emissions.

Activity group LII cannot be held on its own, and groups I to V cannot be granted without it. Activity group L (carbon capture, utilisation and storage) and activity group LI (electricity imported into the customs territory of the Union) are not part of this application.

Applying for a scope is not holding it. The granted scope, if and when it is granted, will be published here and will be the only scope within which a verification report can be issued. This statement is reviewed on the same monthly cycle as the status record above.
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2551, Annex I; Commission guidance of 24 August 2026, §9.2.3, pp.115–116
Before a decision

What is permitted before a grant, and what is not.

The rules are specific, and we hold to them exactly. A verifier under assessment may contract with an operator and carry out preliminary verification work — the accreditation body must in fact witness real verification activity before it can decide. What a verifier may not do before a grant is issue a verification report: an accredited verifier registers in the CBAM Registry within two months of accreditation, and without that registration no report can be generated at all.

Commission guidance of 24 August 2026, §9 p.112, §9.2.1 p.114, §10.2 p.123
The boundary

A verifier that helped build the thing it later tests has verified nothing.

The rule is not ours; it is written into the accreditation requirements. These are the controls that make it real.

  • We do not develop what we verify. We take no part in developing a monitoring methodology, drafting a monitoring plan or drafting an emissions report for an operator we may verify. Providing verification to a client we have consulted is a self-review risk, and it is treated as unacceptable.
  • Recommendations stay inside the findings. Where verification identifies an area for improvement it is reported as a finding. We do not advise on how to close it.
  • Two years. Personnel who have given consultancy advice to an operator are excluded from any verification team for that operator for at least two years, and staff joining with a history of consultancy on monitoring and reporting are kept out of verification engagements for the same period.
  • Five years, then three. A lead auditor may verify the same installation for at most five consecutive years, followed by a three-year break.
  • The independent review is never outsourced. Neither is the issuance of the report.
  • Until a grant is issued, we do not accept a formal CBAM verification engagement, do not issue anything that could be read as a CBAM verification report, do not use the ACCREDIA mark, and do not describe any CBAM service as accredited.
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2551, Annex II §1.7.2–§1.7.6; Commission guidance of 24 August 2026, §8.2 pp.106–108, §8.3 and §8.4

After the grant. Once accreditation is granted, an engagement will be accepted only where the goods fall inside the granted activity groups, where the competence and independence requirements are met, and where there is enough time to examine the installation properly. Accreditation does not oblige us to accept every request, and verification does not guarantee any particular emissions figure.

Describe the claim — not the service.

Tell us what must be relied on, who will rely on it and by what date. We will confirm the correct programme, evidence requirement and responsible entity — or tell you it is outside our scope.