Evidence that withstands scrutiny
The one audit in the cycle that looks at the system in its entirety — and the one with a deadline that cannot be extended.
| The rule | What it requires | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| It addresses the system in its entirety | Recertification confirms continued conformity and effectiveness of the management system as a whole, and the continued relevance and applicability of the scope. This is what surveillance does not do. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.1.1 · 9.6.3.2.1 |
| It reads the whole cycle | The audit includes review of previous surveillance reports and considers performance of the system over the most recent certification cycle. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.1.3 |
| A Stage 1 may be required again | Where there have been significant changes to the management system, to the organisation, or to the context in which it operates — including changes to legislation — recertification may need a Stage 1. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.1.4 |
| Major findings must close before expiry | For any major nonconformity, time limits are set, and correction and corrective action must be implemented and verified before the certification expires. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.2.2 |
| Validity is not extended to wait for you | If the audit is not completed, or a major nonconformity cannot be verified as corrected before the expiry date, recertification is not recommended and the validity of the certification is not extended. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.2.4 |
| The cycle anniversary is preserved | Where recertification completes before expiry, the new expiry date can be based on the existing one, so the cycle does not drift. The issue date is on or after the decision. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.2.3 |
| Restoration is possible for six months | After expiry, certification can be restored within 6 months provided the outstanding recertification activities are completed. Beyond that, at least a Stage 2 is conducted. The expiry date is still based on the prior cycle. | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, 9.6.3.2.5 |
Recertification is scheduled too late. Because clause 9.6.3.2.4 prevents any extension of validity, and clause 9.6.3.2.2 requires major nonconformities to be verified as corrected before expiry, an audit held close to the expiry date leaves no room for a major finding. If one is raised, the certificate lapses. During the gap between expiry and a successful recertification decision the organisation is not certified and must not present itself as certified. Restoration within six months is possible, but it is a recovery route, not a plan. The second failure is a scope that quietly stopped describing the business three years ago — clause 9.6.3.2.1 tests exactly that.
Recertification time is approximately two thirds of the audit time that would be required for a full initial certification audit, calculated on current client information rather than on the information from three years ago. Where the organisation has grown, the base figure grows with it. It is unlikely to be less than one audit day.
Tell us what must be relied on, who will rely on it and by what date. We will confirm the correct programme, evidence requirement and responsible entity — or tell you it is outside our scope.